Colonization in Astroids
The reading and the lecture are both about colonization in Asteroid. The author of the reading feels that there are several reasons to make living in asteroid reasonable. The lecturer challenged the claims made by the author. He is of opinion that it is not practical to colonize Astroid and have serious sides down.
First, the author of the reading argues that colonization in Asteroid is good because of low gravity. The article mentions that low gravity can help with ease of landing of the spaceship and load a lot of colonization equipment and ease of taking off the spaceship. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that low gravity has more health risks. Additionally, he says that low gravity can cause loss of bone density and loss of muscle mass.
Secondly, the writer suggests that colonization in Asteroid is good because of mining valuable metals. In the article, it is said that asteroid is rich with valuable elements that are rare to find on earth and will be profitable to send them to earth. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that metals seem profitable, but we need to take into consideration additional factors. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that these factors can be a high cost to transport those metals to earth and there is no guarantee that the price of the metal will be the same because there will be a lot of metals so there is no need to sell them at a high price.
Finally, the author posits that colonization in Asteroid will be good because it is easy to reach. Moreover, the article stated that Asteroids are easy to reach because from time to time they become near to the earth and easy to go to Asteroids and come back from them. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that it is easy to reach Asteroids, but it is difficult to go back to earth. He notes that when Asteroids be near from earth it is easy to go to it, but the asteroids will not stay near from earth and according to orbit it might be in a distance from earth and it will be difficult to go back to earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... to make living in asteroid reasonable. The lecturer challenged the claims made by ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 10.4613686534 249% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 30.3222958057 214% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 374.0 270.72406181 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52941176471 5.08290768461 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54658897114 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433155080214 0.540411800872 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 419.366225166 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9497482759 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6470588235 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52941176471 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131548188276 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597081614905 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959661882745 0.0662205650399 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101361723265 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890915925903 0.0443174109184 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 12.2367328918 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.