DDT
The topic of the text and the audio presented is the chemical product DDT, which is used to control the spread of unwanted population of insects. While the text describes us the product being dangerous and non efficient, the lecture says the opposite.
First of all, the text tells that DDT is a harmful chemical for humans, animals and plants. Nevertheless, the audio explains that the DDT is dangerous only in big quantities. If we spread or ingest small amount of this product it is not mortal for humans. In fact, it can be beneficial for the plants and animals, the chemical can kill insect’s population that risk spreading diseases.
Moreover, in the passage we can read that DDT endangered human’s life by increasing birth defect, for example. Yet, the lecturer tells us that these data were found in studies that have never been concludes.
Finally, the writing document explains that DDT main goal fails. Indeed, malaria is still spreading in the world trough mosquitoes. By contrast with the text, the lecture teaches us that DDT has been efficient in the past to combat malarias. For instance, in Sri Lanka, malarias’s cases have been reduced due to DDT utilisation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, still, while, for example, for instance, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 199.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0351758794 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73991489982 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597989949749 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 419.366225166 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8496447679 49.2860985944 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.5 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5833333333 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307227701093 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12752260459 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109842374585 0.0662205650399 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192029711688 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747997034605 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.