Deforestation

Essay topics:

Deforestation

The reading passage introduces the topic of deforestation, which means cutting down of all trees. The writer claims that deforestation is beneficial to improve people's lives. The lecturer disagrees by saying that we should not concentrate on short term benefits, owing to long term consequences. He attacks each claim made by the writer by the following reasons.

In the reading, the author begins by stating that, deforestation leads to increase in farmland, and we can use this farmland to grow more crops and raise livestock. The speaker, on the other hand, opposes this claim by saying that, there are alternate ways to increase the farming. And there are new methods of agriculture farming, which doesn't require soil.

Also, the reading passage notes that, with the increse in population, humans need more space, and we can achieve this by deforestation. The lecturer refutes this argument by pointing out that, we are cutting down forests, which are responsible for providing 28 percentage of world's oxygen supply.

Finally, the writer says that, countries like Brazil, Indonesia are dependent on income from deforestation. The speaker finds flaws in this. He contends that, these are developing nations and the workers are being paid lower wages. He goes on to say that, the owners are benefitting from deforestation and not the workers.

All in all, reducing oxygen supply providers doesn't help the economy and doesn't improve people's lives.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...is beneficial to improve peoples lives. The lecturer disagrees by saying that we sh...
^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...w methods of agriculture farming, which doesnt require soil. Also, the reading pas...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 46, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...n all, reducing oxygen supply providers doesnt help the economy and doesnt improve peo...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 74, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...y providers doesnt help the economy and doesnt improve peoples lives.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, so, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33189655172 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74717114798 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5402013631 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3571428571 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5714285714 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 7.06452816374 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117580809532 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485728731713 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959836711154 0.0662205650399 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0624083690641 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050977825916 0.0443174109184 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.