discussion about historical source written by Chevaliar de Seingalt
The passage and lecturer are discussed about historical source written by Chevaliar de Seingalt whether his memoir is reliable or not. Passage holds the idea that his memoir is not valuable besides lecturer holds positive opinion, she furtherly gave specific detail on every statement that the passage holds.
First of all, in reading passage, it stated that Chevalier used to borrow money from Swiss merchant for parties and gambling that leads to conclusion he was not wealthy. However, lecturer stated that he was actually rich but some reason his borrowed money from merchant because he might be ran out cash and he is still considered as rich by the evidence of his property.
Secondly, passage doubt that he had conversation with Voltaire remember every detail after many years which is almost impossible for human to remember memories that happened such long period. Nevertheless, lecturer stated that he wrote down anything he remember and that proving that his memoir is reliable. Also, evidence was found conforming his notes and journal.
Lastly, when he was in Italy prison he escaped using piece of metal by making hole in ceiling which is doubted by the passage. They assumed that jailers were birded to free him because there was connection between some politics in Venice and Chevalier. Even thought, lecturer did not agree with assumption made by passage because of historical evidence happened after the news he escaped. Lecturer stated that, soon after the escape Venice jail rebuilt their roof which clearly giving an evidence that he really did escape from jail.
Lastly, from the beginning to the end lecturer denied every statement pointed in passage by giving specific evidence based example.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'remembers'.
Suggestion: remembers
...r stated that he wrote down anything he remember and that proving that his memoir is rel...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, still, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19784172662 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3958265777 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58273381295 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5402175691 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.416666667 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0948646472755 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542403035924 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166652686021 0.0662205650399 252% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0635472594435 0.162205337803 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118345625081 0.0443174109184 267% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.