Discussion about online encyclopedia and traditional encyclopedia's advantages and disadvantages
Both passage and lecturer discuss about online encyclopedia whether it is reliable or not comparing to traditional encyclopedia. The passage holds the idea that even there are several advantages like anyone can read from online encyclopedia, it is not good as traditional printed encyclopedia which was in stark contrast and refuted by the lecture. The reading was mentioned three statement why online encyclopedia have problems. However, the points made in the lecture cast doubt on the reading.
First, According to the passage, communal encyclopedia is not perfect as printed one because it gives less academic knowledge written by nonspecialist specialist. Regardless, lecturer dismissed the statement that even in traditional encyclopedia is not perfect. Moreover, if they made mistake on printed on it can be fixed easily but it was written in printed one, it will give wrong information for decades.
Secondly, the lecturer disagreed with the reading, stating that hacking is not almost impossible because the web is fully protected and only special person with permission can make change in context. Hence, as mentioned in passage, changing information by hacker is disproved.
Last, the reading mainly stated that in online version, there are too much information wrote against crucial topic; However, the lecturer was critical of the passage. She mention that due to the limited space in printed encyclopedia, specialist wrote only the most important information but online encyclopedia enabled to wrote variety of information that related to the topic.
In sum, given the points clarified by the lecturer, there is no doubt that passage has been proven untrue. Lecturer furtherly explained that online dictionary's strongest advantages was anyone can read fully detail information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 172, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'mentions'.
Suggestion: mentions
...cturer was critical of the passage. She mention that due to the limited space in printe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'dictionarys the strongest'.
Suggestion: dictionarys the strongest
...ecturer furtherly explained that online dictionarys strongest advantages was anyone can read fully de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55474452555 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93377087749 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558394160584 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8761780422 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.076923077 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30239011529 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116558804293 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138093394873 0.0662205650399 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151136822249 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148759413858 0.0443174109184 336% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.8541721854 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.