Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If you need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others, using email/text messaging is better than using telephone/voice-messaging.
Encountering problems and upsetting issues with loved ones, friends, and coworkers is inevitable, but the important matter is how to handle this situation to cause minimum emotional damage to ourselves as well as others. In this respect, some people believe that it's better to resolve problems over emails and text messages, whereas others hold an alternative prospect. The latter group holds the notion that discussing upsetting problems using telephone and voice-messaging is much more sensible. In this case, I contend with the former group.
To begin with, the written form of communication is often accompanied by misunderstanding since the tone of the writer is not obvious, and everyone can interpret the text based on their own logic and even emotions. A sentence written in an empathic manner can be interpreted as a demanding message which can in turn exacerbate the situation and even result in a more severe condition. For instance, once me and my friend got into a quarrel over a project and how to conduct it. One thing led to another, and things heated up as this whole conversation was occurring over text messages. It got to a point where both of us got so annoyed and decided to part ways and do the project individually. But before breaking this news to our professor, we decided to call for the last time and discuss it over the phone. It eventually turned out that we both were misinterpreting each other and even overreacting to the whole situation.
Moreover, when you got to represent something in person, the case can be more compelling and conspicuous. When talking on the phone, for example, you can get an immediate reaction from the other person and control the atmosphere of the discussion by soothing them and expounding your intentions. Furthermore, this can help each party evaluate the honesty of the debate. As deceitful people have less time to think and make up fake stories and excuses. In addition, all this can be more effective and less time-consuming. according to statistics, when people have the opportunity to discuss their problems in person or over the phone or voice mail, which is the next best means of communication, the rate of reconciliation upsurges significantly. They state that direct verbal confabulation plays a major role in identifying honesty and mockery.
To sum it all up, although some find resolving disturbing issues over email and text messages more convenient, I hold the prospect that telephone and voice messaging are more effective means for thereof purpose. Hearing the tone of the speaker can help do away with possible misunderstandings, while it gives less chance to make up false stories to insinuate others. I mean, who can deny the effects of direct communication? Hence, when problems are solved in person rather than over text, reconciliation can achieve more readily and easily.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an empathic manner" with adverb for "empathic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...c and even emotions. A sentence written in an empathic manner can be interpreted as a demanding messa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...more effective and less time-consuming. according to statistics, when people have the opp...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, i mean, in addition, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 7.30242825607 383% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 30.3222958057 204% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2400.0 1373.03311258 175% => OK
No of words: 472.0 270.72406181 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08474576271 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.04702891845 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99525323503 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 145.348785872 182% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 758.7 419.366225166 181% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.25165562914 559% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5612725517 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.090909091 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 4.33554083885 300% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21344380285 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549563516749 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061685707753 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137443263901 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760758384061 0.0443174109184 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 63.6247240618 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.