Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and TV programs made in one s own country are more interesting than those made in other countries

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Movies and TV programs made in one’s own country are
more interesting than those made in other countries.

Nowadays, mass media comprising movies and TV programs have become a prevalent form of entertainment worldwide, which have a more far-reaching influence on people's lives than formerly was perceived. That movies made in the country are more preferable for people to movies made abroad is one of the most contentious issues. In this regard, some hold the notion that national movies are better means of entertainment for country residents. In contrast, some hold an alternative conviction and perspective that foreign movies and programs bring people more joy. To my best knowledge, people gravitate toward foreign countries' movies for several reasons that will be expounded in the following paragraphs.

To commence with, in countries with poor infrastructure for the development of art, as in movies or TV programs, the quality of the productions may be so low that would not fulfill the needs and desires of its people. To be more clear, in developing countries, in which the initial and primary concern of the government is to overcome economic and financial barriers, the importance of movies and Tv programs pales into significance, and less attention is paid to making quality work and lower, and in some occasions, no budget is allocated for making movies. As a result, the public audience's attention is shifted toward the existing products in the market, which provide the audience with entertainment. For example, a survey conducted by my university in my hometown revealed that in middle eastern countries, which are developing countries, people watch Western movies and programs 70% higher compared to those of their own country. This survey points to the poor quality of the countries' production as the main culprit of this phenomenon.

Furthermore, history has always shown that different nations are always fond of narrowing the gaps between each other and getting to know each other. One of the best means to bring different nations close is exchanging culture through the means of media, as in this case, TV programs and movies. In other words, movies and programs can be great cultural ambassadors. Hence, there is a substantial rise in the collaborative production of movies, meaning that artists from different countries come together and produce international movies. This can help countries exchange cultures and get to know each other better. Moreover, watching other countries' movies can familiarize people with the cultures and languages of other nations with the helping hand of cultural cues embedded in the movies. For instance, once I wanted to travel to Japan, and by watching some Japanese movies and programs, I was able to familiarize myself with Japanese customs and cultures and some useful daily slang and sentences to help conduct my business there. Had it not been for the movies, I would not be able to communicate efficiently with people during my trip.

To recapitulate, the paucity and dearth of quality TV programs and movies reinforce people's inclination and tendency toward foreign movies. Furthermore, watching other countries' productions can bring nations together via cultural exchange and help people to get a glimpse into the life of other nations. With all of these reasons being mentioned, who can ignore the role of foreign movies' role in people's lives?

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ll the needs and desires of its people. To be more clear, in developing countries...
^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...desires of its people. To be more clear, in developing countries, in which the in...
^^
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'audiences'' or 'audience's'?
Suggestion: audiences'; audience's
... making movies. As a result, the public audiences attention is shifted toward the existin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 985, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...urvey points to the poor quality of the countries production as the main culprit of this ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 383, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'movies'' or 'movie's'?
Suggestion: movies'; movie's
...ned, who can ignore the role of foreign movies role in peoples lives?
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in contrast, as a result, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2787.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 529.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26843100189 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83411180226 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470699432892 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 846.0 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6905818675 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.714285714 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1904761905 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2380952381 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282907729647 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926407238945 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621903956484 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177984751576 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544386137912 0.0645574589148 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.