Some people prefer to read the original book before they watch the movie, other prefer to watch the movie before reading the book. Which one do you prefer?
Nowadays, movies based on renowned books have become a common form of entertainment. That whether to read the book prior to watching the movie or not has become a controversial topic. Some people hold the notion that reading the book beforehand is preferable. Whereas others possess an alternative prospect. In this regard, I agree with the former group due to the reasons which are expounded in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, most of these book-based movies are summaries of the books. In other words, they do not comprise all the details, events, courses of action, and sometimes characteristics of the book due to several reasons like time and budget restrictions. At best, these movies endeavor to depict some important adventures and events of the book. Hence, one cannot get the full experience by solely depending on the film. Moreover, this can also lead to misconstruing the storyline. For example, once I watched a well-known movie, "the fault in our stars," before reading the book. It was a well-structured movie; however, it lacked some important dialogues and events, leaving me with questions at the end of the movie. On the other hand, when I read the book, I got a better grasp of the storyline and figured out how little of the story was illustrated in the movie.
Furthermore, while reading the book, one typically portrays what is written in their mind by the use of a powerful tool called imagination. While reading a book, you can visualize how the characters seem and how they look in your mind, along with many other details. Improving the sense of imagination can be of good hand in many real-life situations. For instance, it can help people improve their problem-solving skills or help run risk reduction measures since they can imagine and come up with alternative potential scenarios and ways to avoid or overcome them in advance. On the other hand, when the movie is watched beforehand reading the book, the sense of imagination is abstained from people, and most people remain myopic and pedestrian viewers. To clarify things, I want to refer to the results of a recent study on students' problem-solving skills. In this study, two groups of students, one who better enjoyed reading books and novels and others who preferred watching movies and video games, were asked to come up with solutions for some made-up scenarios. The results indicated that the students bound to reading more books were more successful in giving reasonable solutions compared to the latter group.
To recapitulate all, on the issue of whether to read the book before watching the book-based movie or vice versa, I firmly stand with reading the book first for two obvious reasons. First, movies are only a fraction of a whole and do not guarantee the whole experience of the story. Second, watching the movie before reading the book prohibits the chance of imagination, and the viewer is somehow spoonfed. I mean, who can deny the joy of going through the pages of a book and building up a whole kingdom and its inhabitants in your mind?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ding the book beforehand is preferable. Whereas others possess an alternative prospect....
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...nown movie, 'the fault in our stars,' before reading the book. It was a well...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, i mean, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2562.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 516.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96511627907 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79396342078 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515503875969 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 785.7 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4374999312 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.48 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.64 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.56 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469444414636 0.236089414692 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119680650246 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987883263092 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287347235073 0.150856017488 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311579966841 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.