The reading and the lecture are illustrating the pros and cons with respect to topic entitled " Professors is better to focus on classroom, offices and libraries doing research in universities rather than appeared as a guest on television or TV celebrity with the questioning raise by lecturer that have people seriously benefited from scholar appearance or they just destroying the image of university and professor?".
First, the article posits that professors are gaining the possibility by entering in media. Within university, only students know them within campus but after entering in the entertainment world, wide public will get to know them. However, speaker points out that professor doesn't achieve anything from this. Eventually, image of expertise gets spoil. Many conference, meeting avoids their entry and they are facing the difficulty in receiving the fund for own research. They would have to experienced the hard time because of these incidents.
Also, the author notes that university take the advantage of professor knowledge in front of community. University might thinks that it help in improvement of reputation of both department as well as professor. It helps to attract more or more candidate in research and also get the scope of allure more fund for research. The lecturer rebuts this argument by saying that it is responsible for killing the precious time of professor because inspite of working in research field, professor have been focusing on presentation prepare, rehearsal, travelling, looks etc which will affecting the research output of university.
Another reason, the writer feels that viewer obtain the chance to learn from experts and get the opportunity to know about the latest events has been happening around them. They get a taste of real expertise and scientific perception. Again the speaker deny by saying that mankind doesn't acquire any knowledge because speech had altered according to producer, only some part of professor works is presenting to audience. Furthermore, reporter have the capable to given that report to public very easily by doing little homework by themselves.
To wrap up, both the author and the lecturer are hold conflicting views about the topic that anyone can achieving any knowledge from professor or not. Also, human are taking any profit from it or is there any surge in reputation of university?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ever, speaker points out that professor doesnt achieve anything from this. Eventually,...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun conference seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many conferences'.
Suggestion: Many conferences
...ntually, image of expertise gets spoil. Many conference, meeting avoids their entry and they ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...vement of reputation of both department as well as professor. It helps to attract more or ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...the speaker deny by saying that mankind doesnt acquire any knowledge because speech ha...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 105, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'achieve'
Suggestion: achieve
...g views about the topic that anyone can achieving any knowledge from professor or not. Al...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, well, as well as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 30.3222958057 191% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 1373.03311258 147% => OK
No of words: 378.0 270.72406181 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35185185185 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81906455061 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 145.348785872 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57671957672 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 419.366225166 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.3485948771 49.2860985944 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2352941176 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246059966564 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655539843355 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635613470132 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12584597654 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074723384917 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 63.6247240618 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.7273730684 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.