Driverless cars
The article states that autonomous cars are the future and they can be reduce certain problems by providing three reasons of support. However the professor feels that they will increase the current problems by refuting all the points the author makes.
Firstly, the article claims that driverless cars will result in less accidents since they are much better in analysing the environment than humans. The article gives an example of an auto-piloted car which travels seven hundred thousand miles without any accident. The professor argues by saying that they are made by humans and are prone to errors since nothing is perfect. He then states that the vehicle which drove the mentioned distance recently crashed into a car which was all over the news, showing that automous cars are not as reliable as expected.
Secondly, the article says that driverless cars will result in reduced environmental pollution by communicating with other cars and using their engines effectively. On the other hand the lecturer contends that since there will be no need to drive, one can acquire a drivers licence easily without any age restriction and thus it will result in more number of cars on the road overall, increasing the pollution.
Lastly, the article posits that with these advanced vehicles, the passengers will have extra time to work since there will be no need for them to drive. The professor opposes this point by saying that the time a person drives is used for relaxing, using this time into work will result in a waste of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... by providing three reasons of support. However the professor feels that they will incr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun accidents is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ims that driverless cars will result in less accidents since they are much better in...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99221789883 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44252003093 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568093385214 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0914688612 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.3 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25017629522 0.272083759551 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105792212976 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116579786663 0.0662205650399 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1522082266 0.162205337803 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118422900877 0.0443174109184 267% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.