The reading and the lecture are both about elephant behaviors. The author of the reading feels that there are several beliefs about surprising elephant behaviors. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. She is of opinion that elephant are fascinating is misunderstanding.
First, the author of the reading argues that elephants are aware of approaching death. The article mentions that when the elephants feel they are old and weak they will separate from the herds and go alone near the water to die a lone. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that when elephants separate from herds does not mean they are dying. Additionally, she says that there are several reasons that elephants go alone near water like their teeth wore down and they go near water to look for softer food.
Secondly, the writer suggests that elephants representing objects through art. In the article, it is said that elephants have artistic ability and they can hold a brush with their trunk and paint on canvas. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that elephants eras are big and sensitive. She elaborates on this by bringing up the point that elephants eras are large and very sensitive and paint trainer can stroke that ears to stimulate the elephant to learn and remember specific pattern of moving brush and elephant does not know necessarily that this line will draw flower.
Finally, the author posits that elephants have fear from mice. Moreover, the article stated that elephants leave area that they find mice in it and they have fear from it more than dangerous animals like lions, tigers. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that elephant does not have fear from mice. She notes that mice are unfamiliar to elephants and they take caution from them till they get familiar to them then they will not have a fear from them anymore and elephants are living in area of mice they do not have fear from mice because they are already living with mice and know them.
in conclusion the lecturer opinion is in contrast to author beliefs.
|2022-09-29||Allenwlh||80||Read full essay|
|2021-02-02||hind aljubori||73||Read full essay|
|email@example.com||73||Read full essay|
|2019-11-01||nagy||78||Read full essay|
|2019-10-25||Apolytos||70||Read full essay|
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...fs about surprising elephant behaviors. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
Line 2, column 228, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...erds and go alone near the water to die a lone. This specific argument is challenged b...
Line 4, column 582, Rule ID: KNOW_NOW
Message: Did you mean 'now'?
...e they are already living with mice and know them. in conclusion the lecturer opini...
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
...lready living with mice and know them. in conclusion the lecturer opinion is in c...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 22.412803532 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 352.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90625 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42279916052 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0329067274 49.2860985944 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9444444444 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257405030278 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112630009728 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061162493751 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149623505747 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870549771211 0.0443174109184 196% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.