employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day.
In this set of material, the reading section states that offering an option to employees to work a four-day week and accept less pay and provides three reasons for support. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
The author claims that a four-day week employee increases the company's profit as the employees feel rested and alert, and as a result, they would make less costly errors. The professor rejects this point. He says that this option will force the company to spend more money on adding new employees to make up a four-day week employee. This means extra payment for medical costs and needs for new offices and computers.
The reading states that in the country it will reduce unemployment rates when companies need to fulfill their employees. The professor refutes this argument. As he said above, the high cost of hiring new employees, companies ask employees to do the same in a five-day week instead of hiring new ones. So no additional job will create and the current jobs are unpleasant.
According to the reading, it will improve an individual's life quality, have more time to spend with family, and pursuing private interests. The lecturer believes that it will decrease the job ability and it is harmful. As the result, they will lose their job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 171, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...lt, they would make less costly errors. The professor rejects this point. He says t...
^^^
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ding to the reading, it will improve an individuals life quality, have more time to spend w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87555555556 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4387975179 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582222222222 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8655384929 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3846153846 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3076923077 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.46153846154 7.06452816374 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212374632041 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631872338102 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852323003583 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122591310432 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795259640459 0.0443174109184 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.