employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day.
In this set of material, the reading passage talks about an option for employees, a four-day workweek, and its advantages for both company and employee by providing three reasons. The lecturer casts doubt about what mentioned as an advantage.
The author claims that the shortened workweek would increase company profits because employees would feel more rested and alert, and as a result, they would make fewer costly errors in their work. The professor rejects this idea. He thinks hiring new employees, force the company an additional cost like medical benefits and training costs. So, it would quickly cut into company profits.
The reading passage indicates that it would reduce unemployment by hiring new staff. The Lecturer refutes this point. He says that as he mentioned above hiring new ones is costly so there are other options. Managers might just ask employees to work overtime to make up the difference or it might raise the expectations from them. If this happens, then no additional jobs will be created and current jobs will become more unpleasant.
In the end, this option would increase their life quality while the professor believes it also presents some risks. Because it would decrease their job stability and they are likely to be the first to lose their jobs during an economic downturn and they may be passed for promotions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...make fewer costly errors in their work. The professor rejects this idea. He thinks ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, so, then, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08071748879 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44541446 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618834080717 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6443229666 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1538461538 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1538461538 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84615384615 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0865306063613 0.272083759551 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0248729171787 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479303567896 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0568691776911 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466532667637 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.