At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next
The passage discusses that there was a mass extinction event in about million years ago that destroyed more than half of living species. In this terrible event only dinosaurs could be alive and to become the dominant species for the next 145 million years. The article provides three reasons to support this theory. In contrast, the professor thinks these reasons do not seem convincing and rejects all of them.
Firs, the reading claims that the cause of extinction was related to the decrease of the sea levels. So, the decrease in the sea levels destroyed the habitats for marine animals. As a result, it had bad effects on food chains. Therefore, many of living animals extincted. However, the professor rebuts this idea by stating that it is not a good reason for extinction. Additionaly, she explains that this change acoured gradually and for killing these amount of animals it needed to be a quick phenomenon.
Second, the article argues that there is a possibility that large amount of sulfur oxid thet released to the atmosphere during the volcanic activity was responsible for the mass extinction. By having a lot of amount of this gas in the atmosphere the remperature will decrease and it can lead to extinction of animals, but the professor refutes this too. The professor describes that this event can decrease the temperature only for a short time. Also, sulfuric acid can combine with the water in the atmosphere and back as rain into the ground. The professor strongly rejects this reason.
Third, the text asserts that asteroid strike was the cause of mass extinction. While the professor explains that there are few of scientists that believe this theory. Furthermore, the professor describes that the crators they have finds are belong to many many years before the mass extinction period. So, these strikes are not the answer to mass extinction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...re was a mass extinction event in about million years ago that destroyed more than half...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ible event only dinosaurs could be alive and to become the dominant species for t...
^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun amount seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of amounts'.
Suggestion: a lot of amounts
...ible for the mass extinction. By having a lot of amount of this gas in the atmosphere the rempe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...trike was the cause of mass extinction. While the professor explains that there are f...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 241, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...es that the crators they have finds are belong to many many years before the mass exti...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 251, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: many
...e crators they have finds are belong to many many years before the mass extinction period...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, second, so, therefore, third, while, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 312.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99679487179 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58499302479 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516025641026 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.802907785 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0526315789 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4210526316 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345870526957 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929817229515 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110906650951 0.0662205650399 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216435750406 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127128999834 0.0443174109184 287% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.