Essay topics: TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task
I this set materials, the reading claim that one such paiting is know as attributed to Rembrand because of it is style, and know to be by Rembrandt. But there are problems with the pinting that suggest it could not be a work by Rambrand. In the lecture, the professor explan that is true and the examination have been recently conclued.
First,the author of the reading says claim that there is something inconsistent about the way the woman inthe porteait is dressed. However, the professor in the lecture refutes tjis ponti by saying that, pigment was made 100 year after than the picture, and was used formal to do this.
Second, the article posit that Rembrandt was a master of painting light and shadow, however in this paiting these elements do not fit together. But according to the professor samples coler of refute ilumination, since the face of the woman in the painting is not in shadow and the stile was realism.
Third, the author affirms that examination of the back of painting revels that is was painted on panel made of several pieces of wood glued together. In the lecture, the professor oppose this point by explain that the wood is só large to be gued making a simple peace.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
... reading claim that one such paiting is know as attributed to Rembrand because of it...
^^^^
Line 3, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...on have been recently conclued. First,the author of the reading says claim that t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: VBZ_VBD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...ion of the back of painting revels that is was painted on panel made of several pi...
^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... of the back of painting revels that is was painted on panel made of several pieces...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 211.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71090047393 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45310913642 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568720379147 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.4336468026 49.2860985944 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.444444444 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 7.06452816374 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388480614075 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141506110466 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1017674364 0.0662205650399 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214529936877 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870435639146 0.0443174109184 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.