ETS first writing exam
The article and the lecturer discuss the probability of R.robustus to being a predator. While the article testifies the fact that R.robustus could not be a hunter, the illustration of the lecturer asserts another theory.
Firstly, the article demonstrates that R.robustus is as meager as a "domestic cat". However, the lecturer believes the size of R.robustus is enough to hunt baby dinosaurs.
Moreover, the article's explanation about the size of the R.robustus shows that its legs are proper being a scavenger and not a predator. The lecturer argues the position of the creature legs is similar to the Tasmanian devil, which is a hunter animal lives nowadays. Therefore, R.robustus had enough ability for catching prey.
Finally, the article claims hence the bones of the animal eaten by the R.robustus left unharmed, R.robustus was not a hunter. The lecturer says in spite of the article's claim, the animal could be a predator since it swallowed its food. She demonstrates that because of the shape of R.robustus’s jaws, it had to swallow its food; consequently, it could be a predator.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...strates that R.robustus is as meager as a 'domestic cat'. However, the ...
^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'articles'' or 'article's'?
Suggestion: articles'; article's
...to hunt baby dinosaurs. Moreover, the articles explanation about the size of the R.rob...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, therefore, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 1373.03311258 68% => OK
No of words: 178.0 270.72406181 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25842696629 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08631049322 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 145.348785872 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516853932584 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1268780393 49.2860985944 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.6 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.