the Everglades' environmental issues
The reading and the lecture both talk about the Everglades. The reading passage says that the everglades is endangered because of several environmental problems. The lecturer, however, argues that these issues that threaten the Everglades has been alleviated for several reasons.
To begin with, the article contends that the Everglades is polluted by fertilizers that sugarcane farms and other agriculture uses, lowering the amount of oxygen in the water. On the contrary, the lecturer disagrees with this argument. He claims that water pollution level has been declined because of the government’s regulations regarding the use of fertilizer and limiting fertilizers from including harmful ingredients.
Secondly, the author, in the reading, says that the fertile soil in the Everglades will be diminished due to drain of 19th by US government. By contrast, the lecturer casts doubt on this assertion. He insists that this soil has been recovering by local people. Although this recovering project might take long time, eventually the land will be nourished with vibrant ecosystem.
The final point made in the reading is that natural species in the Everglades are taken away their inhabitants by human activities. However, the lecturer goes against this point by stating that the new government bought the property that was used to be cultivated sugar canes, and they planned to convert this area to marsh where it used to be. Moreover, he points out that by obtaining this region, the Florida panther will have their larger habitats, which will increase the possibility of their survival.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ause of several environmental problems. The lecturer, however, argues that these is...
^^^
Line 13, column 509, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ease the possibility of their survival.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43824701195 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83647432176 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593625498008 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2976002069 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122978204418 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459969676611 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687604131036 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837195286446 0.162205337803 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086117467826 0.0443174109184 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.