Lambeosaurus dinosaur
The reading and the lecture both talk about the function of Lambeosaurus’ crest. The reading passage says that there are several possible theories of crest’s utilization. The lecturer, however, argues that none of theories mentioned in the reading are not proved thoroughly.
To begin with, the article contends that male Lambeosaurus may use their crests to attract female since its feature experienced changes while growing. On the contrary, the lecturer disagrees with this argument. She claims that this theory is suspicious because most reptiles attract other sex by behavior and sound. For example, crocodiles which are similar to dinosaurs are creating noise by lifting head to communicate with opposite sex.
Secondly, the author, in the reading, says that crests were used when they had fights, like Triceratops did. By contrast, the lecturer casts doubt on this assertion. She insists that the analysis, which was conducted by fossils, showed that Lambeosaurus’ crest was grown backward, so it seems hardly to use it for combat. She also points out that it is absurd to compare this crest with triceratops’ which was dense and sturdy because Lambeosaurus’ was hollow. So, the crest must be too weak to be used for attack.
The final point made in the reading is that Lambeosaurus used this crest as water storage since it was connected to lung, and helped them forage plants under the water. However, the lecturer goes against this point by stating that the crest was too small to provide enough air to this massive creature. She also adds that it must be easier for Lambeosaurus to take a deep breath when they eat aquatic plants, instead of getting help of the small crest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e theories of crest's utilization. The lecturer, however, argues that none of ...
^^^
Line 9, column 293, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'seems'.
Suggestion: hardly seems
...s' crest was grown backward, so it seems hardly to use it for combat. She also points o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ead of getting help of the small crest.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19713261649 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85231254403 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584229390681 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1839869956 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152014362718 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469078092084 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517351595618 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901889796104 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230522011539 0.0443174109184 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.