Genetic Modification
The reading passage proposes genetic modification as a way to genetic changing in an organism to improve its characteristics, especially in trees. It brings up three cogent reasons to back up this hypothesis. But the professor in the lecture casts doubt to information and reasons mentioned in the passage and give some explanations to contradicts them.
First, the passage states that trees that have been modified genetically are harder than a wild tree. on the other hand, the professor shares the idea that it is questionable. He brings up the points that the genetically modified trees are much more uniform but the non-modified ones are diverse in kind. The resistance is limited to just one species not all of them. So a change in the climate conditions, for example, can destroy all of them.
Second, the author asserts that it is supposed genetically modified trees have economic benefits. Conversely, the lecturer says that this idea not to be taken seriously because the farmer Do not have additional benefits for the trees because they have not any seeds to collect.
Finally, the author holds the idea that these kinds of trees can have benefits for wild trees by eliminating overexploitation. on the contrary, the professor refutes this point because he explains genetically modified trees can damage the natural trees by crowding out them and it can be a competition between the wild trees and genetically modified ones for their requirements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...enetically are harder than a wild tree. on the other hand, the professor shares th...
^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... trees by eliminating overexploitation. on the contrary, the professor refutes thi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, if, second, so, for example, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15062761506 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95147285791 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531380753138 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1292972118 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.583333333 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194707318355 0.272083759551 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072824824116 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112152956825 0.0662205650399 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122371787627 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644278020851 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.