“Globalization” refers to the growing economic and cultural interconnectedness between different regions of the world. Because modern transportation and electronic communication have made commercial relationships between distant people easier than ever before, the world is rapidly becoming a single interactive zone. This phenomenon has brought several unanticipated benefits.
The most commonly cited virtue of globalization is that it allows developing nations to use their low costs of living to their advantage. Because workers in developing nations can survive on less money, the production of goods in the developing world is significantly cheaper. This encourages business with those economies, fostering economic wellbeing. Southeast Asia, for example, has seen annual economic growth, allowing its citizens to live more comfortably today than their parents did only a generation ago.
A secondary but no less noteworthy advantage is that world trade creates competition that would otherwise be missing. As the rise of capitalism has demonstrated, competition forces the producers of goods to keep their goods’ quality as high as or higher than that of their competitors and, simultaneously, their costs as affordable as possible. This means, in general, better goods for lower prices among those countries that participate in the global system. Those that do not, meanwhile, see prices climb.
Finally, globalization has cultivated a mutual reliance between countries that puts pressure on governments to make safer and healthier choices. Countries that rely on one another’s business are far less likely to go to war, for instance, and also must listen to the environmental concerns of their business partners. Countries that pollute excessively will see less business, and therefore must learn to curb environmental damage.
The article is about the Globalization's positive effects on the economy & environment, and it provides several reasons for support. However, the professor states that this mutual connection among countries has actually negative impacts on the economics of a nation and its environmental conditions, and he provides several reasons to prove his points.
Firstly, the reading claims that Globalization has connected with the world, and provided the commercial relationship easier than ever. The professor refutes this point by saying that inter-dependence had made countries more vulnerable of economic effects of one country to another. He says that the recession occurred in America in 2008 had spread its consequences to a number of countries in Europe. So this way, the globalization may disturb a country's economic situation if any other is affected.
Secondly, the article claims that this interconnectedness brings business or jobs in a developing country. However, the professor posits that this interdependence among countries actually shifts the business from one location to another. He cites examples of the shifting of manufacturing companies to Mexico from the USA because of cheap labors.
Thirdly, the reading states that Globalization cultivates environmental pollution. On the other hand, the professor claims that this process actually brings more pollution to a country. According to him, when a country produces any items at a lower cost, then they compromise with environmental pollution norms, and this led to more air pollution in developing countries.
This way, the professor contradicts the various points made in the reading and provides relevant examples to support his point.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64980544747 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20516154245 2.5805825403 124% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540856031128 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6826910122 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.692307692 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0568408936118 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0243029450032 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038029044374 0.0662205650399 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0312837989031 0.162205337803 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313168945365 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.2367328918 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.