The reading and the lecture are talking about the cloud seeding, in the reading said that it is a solution for the hail pieces, problem while the listening had an opposite opinion.
First and foremost, in the reading, they explained to us what is the cloud seeding and how is solve the hail- pieces destroy the farms in some states in the U.S, and they said that the lots of experiments give the proof about that, whereas the lecturer it is true that the laboratory's evidence is true but in the air maybe it is not, that because of maybe there is no rain in the cloud.
In the second place, the author said that the process had succeeded in some areas in Asia, and the effect about the cloud seeding reduced the hail-pieces problem than the previous years, While in the listening record said that the experiment occurred in the Urban areas in Asia, which there is no pollution in its air with chemicals, and that makes a difference in the
cities.
Thirdly, the writer said that the cloud seeding had saved the farms in the central of the U.S., but the speaker said that this solution saved the areas that are in the south and north of the country, not the center.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'solved'.
Suggestion: solved
...us what is the cloud seeding and how is solve the hail- pieces destroy the farms in s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...stroy the farms in some states in the U.S, and they said that the lots of experim...
^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f maybe there is no rain in the cloud. In the second place, the author said tha...
^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cals, and that makes a difference in the cities. Thirdly, the writer said tha...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, third, thirdly, whereas, while, talking about, it is true, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 1373.03311258 70% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50934579439 5.08290768461 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18566243334 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 145.348785872 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471962616822 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 419.366225166 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 53.0 21.2450331126 249% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.1192112295 49.2860985944 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 241.25 110.228320801 219% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 53.5 21.698381199 247% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 27.75 7.06452816374 393% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152167821115 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09125920976 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334324280466 0.0662205650399 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916426521129 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338084657259 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.6 13.3589403974 199% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.4 11.0289183223 185% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.77 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 10.7273730684 247% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 23.2 10.498013245 221% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 27.0 11.2008830022 241% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.