Historians military strategists political scientists and economists are all greatly interested in the mechanisms that led to the rise of the roman empire the roman empire known for sustained military and political domination of many areas of europe north

Essay topics:

Historians, military strategists, political scientists and economists are all greatly interested in the mechanisms that led to the rise of the roman empire. the roman empire, known for sustained military and political domination of many areas of europe, north africa, and the near east, has captured the interests of many analysts who have developed three possible reasons for the rise of and domination of the roman empire.
Firstly, the roman army was superior to all neighboring armies. despite having a very small domestic population, rome was able to successfully develop the world’s first professional army. the army was well-trained, well-disciplined, and well-equipped. when necessary, the army was supplemented with mercenaries to fill the ranks. additionally, rome had a mighty navy which could swiftly and efficiently deploy troops, increasing the area which rome could effectively control. this superior military helped rome defeat competing armies and help maintain the empire’s stability with aggressive force.
A second factor that contributed to the rise of the roman empire was the unchallenged power of the emperor. roman emperors possessed enormous power over the courts and government as well as the military and regular citizens. in effect, the emperor was just short of an infallible deity. by holding these powers, the emperor could prosecute anyone who interfered with the performance of his duties. because of this, detractors and dissidents were unlikely to object to the actions of the emperor. this afforded the empire with solidarity and helped it rise to regional dominance.
Another feature of the roman empire was high taxes. wealth coming from taxes helped the roman government continue military campaigns and feed army camps. additionally, public works projects like roads and other infrastructure were completed with money taxed from individuals. this income in turn helped stimulate the economy, promoting a prosperous and rich environment for trade.

The passage discusses the greatness of the Roman Empire and puts forward several reasons all of which contributed to its wide domination. However, the lecture deeply believes that they directly led to calppsing the Roman Empire.
First and foremost, the article asserts that the Roman Empire's army was superior because of not only its skilled troops but also its navy to move time efficiently. On the other hand, the professor points out that the Roman army was more loyal to their commanders rather than their emperor which weakened the Roman empire.
Secondly, the writer contends that the unquestioned power of the emperors afforded them to dominate lots of lands. The speaker, conversely, calls this into question. He explicitly argues that since no one was in the place to complain against the emperors' decisions, they made many poor decisions all of which led to weaken the Roman Empire.
last but not least, The author claims that high taxes provided the Roman Empire with enough budget to not only feed the army but to complete public projects such as roads. On the contrary, the lecture clears out that high rat taxes were paid by mostly peasants and farmers which brought about a revelation that ended the Roman Empire.

Votes
Average: 8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Last
...which led to weaken the Roman Empire. last but not least, The author claims that h...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, second, secondly, so, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 206.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9854368932 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34065669579 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611650485437 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1497197998 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.111111111 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5555555556 7.06452816374 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183323083076 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729132514493 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428983183922 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114029925902 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374957704891 0.0443174109184 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Last
...which led to weaken the Roman Empire. last but not least, The author claims that h...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, second, secondly, so, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 206.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9854368932 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34065669579 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611650485437 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1497197998 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.111111111 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5555555556 7.06452816374 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183323083076 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729132514493 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428983183922 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114029925902 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374957704891 0.0443174109184 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.