how people accept facts
The text is describing the effect of higher education on having a clearer think and believes that, high level of education, helps people to think and decide better and provides some examples as proof. On the other hand, the professor goes against all of the claims made by the text and refutes them.
First, the text claims that, based on rumors and wrong information which medias spread, the best way to make up people’s mind and help them to think in the correct way is “fact checking”. The text explains that, fact checking will brighten people and helps them to have a better understanding of issues. On contrast, the professor refutes this claim and says that, facts do not have this power to change people’s mind. The professor explains that, when people have wrong information, the use of fact checking is absurd; because, even correct information, do not have this power to make a change in people’s mind.
Second, the text says that, people base their opinion on facts; and the more information they have, the more informed their opinions will be. The text provides an example of the political debates as a way which people can listen to different side of their opinion, so, they can think brighter. In contrast, the professor says that, people put their opinion on their belief rather than facts. He explains that beliefs lead to accepting bad information which is in the same path of people’s belief, in this way, people will listen to new information less.
Third, the text explains that, when people feel insecure, they will seek for facts and truth more, to be able to make potential solutions about problems; they will listen to experts who can give them correct information. The professor refutes this claim and says that, when people feel threatened and insecure, they will not listen to others and as a result they will be kept in fear. He believes that when people feel insecure, they will not listen to oppose opinion and in this way they can be controlled easier.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... other hand, the professor goes against all of the claims made by the text and refutes the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 343.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90670553936 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55198482395 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.431486880466 0.540411800872 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.0675465186 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.461538462 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203647424495 0.272083759551 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919712765515 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518851345702 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118266763999 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554387223119 0.0443174109184 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.