Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different from yours.
News resources are one of the most controversial topics in each society. Each resource tries to covers specific part of topics, and it increases the need of following news from different resources and seeing them from the view point of different people. In my view, it is necessary to get the news from the people who are in the other side of our thought. I would like to elaborate on my opinion with the following reasons.
First, hearing the news from another point of view helps people to consider different aspects of topics. Based on this point that none of the news resources are neutral, and each of them are inclined to a power holder, hearing news from the people who hold another point of view makes it possible to see the big picture of the reality. Following the news from limited resources puts people’s mind into a frame, and declines the chance of thinking broadly about different topics. As an example I can mention to the news media in my country, Iran. There are lose of news resources in my country, and each of them adherents a special politician. By having just a glance at each of these data bases, people can easily become aware of different views of each topic, and it helps to think without any bias. This point is one of the reasons for holding this idea that people should hear the news from the people with opposite point of view.
Second, accessing to the news from the people with oppose point of view helps people to think more wisely, and find the truth easier. For obtaining the reality, people should think broadly, and consider all prone aspects which is feasible just by getting the news from people with different opinions. There is always a chance of this point that the news which are more favorable to us do not be true, and people just by paying attention to the opposite side can become aware of this point. My own experience is a compelling example of this point. Three years ago, I was really into a specific political movement, and thought it can really make a huge positive change in my country. My tendency toward that political issue was so much that made me blind, and did not let me to see the whole reality. After some months, a friend of mine, who had another view toward that topic, gave me some information which I was not aware of them, and it could completely change my opinion. This experience led me to this conclusion that people should always give a chance to themselves to hear the news from another side too.
To sum up, Thanks to the tons of news resources it is not hard to become aware of the whole reality, and it is more prone to hear the news from the oppose side. Hearing the news from the side that people are fan of it gives them this chance to follow up the news they are inclined to, but getting them from another point of view, makes it feasible to see the big picture which is more similar to the reality. Moreover, it helps people to think without bias. Based on these justifications, my conviction is that it is necessary for people to hear the news from those who do not hold the same opinion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'cover'.
Suggestion: cover
...in each society. Each resource tries to covers specific part of topics, and it increas...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'lost'.
Suggestion: lost
...ws media in my country, Iran. There are lose of news resources in my country, and ea...
^^^^
Line 8, column 145, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... it is more prone to hear the news from the oppose side. Hearing the news from the side th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, really, second, so, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 99.0 52.1666666667 190% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2529.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 561.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50802139037 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86676880123 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30786235029 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.377896613191 0.524837075471 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 787.5 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 13.0 1.86738351254 696% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6270982904 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.956521739 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3913043478 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91304347826 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281999000351 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10760499396 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724369214091 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218277932406 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186771608666 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.