human believes on elephant
the lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not the elephant has a supernatural power. while the reading states that People had a strong relationship with elephants for a long time; they believe elephants have supernatural powers. The professor refutes this, saying that the argument is not convincing and impractical.
First of all, the reading claims the elephants known their death; they move to near the water beds. most of the fossil records support the climes that elephants are died near to water. However, The lecture argues that the claim was not practical, Because they go near to streams for soft food. Furthermore, the professor states that the older elephant lost the tooth; they can't eat hard food, yet they need soft food which is enriched near the water beds.
In addition, people believe the elephant is capable of portrait pictures; they draw pictures like flowers and other routine things. The lecture counters this point by pointing out that because of the training. Moreover, the professor says elephants had sensitive ears; the trainer uses that region to train such huge animals. so, it is all because of the human training.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that elephant scare by seeing mice. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out it is a misinterpretation. according to the professor, the mice and the elephant are two distinct size and species; they are unfamiliar with each other. He illustrated that zoos have elephant and mice. yet, an elephant never gets scar for mice because they are well known each other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the lecture and the reading both discuss wh...
^^^
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not the elephant has a supernatural power. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... the elephant has a supernatural power. while the reading states that People had a st...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Most
...eath; they move to near the water beds. most of the fossil records support the clime...
^^^^
Line 2, column 374, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...the older elephant lost the tooth; they cant eat hard food, yet they need soft food ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...that region to train such huge animals. so, it is all because of the human trainin...
^^
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...pointing out it is a misinterpretation. according to the professor, the mice and the elep...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 320, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Yet
...rated that zoos have elephant and mice. yet, an elephant never gets scar for mice b...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, lastly, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05426356589 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53024490801 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542635658915 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6632673614 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.125 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29195818836 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934084297264 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698934989712 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179730516885 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594174979341 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.