Imagine you could improve the town where you live by changing one important thing about it. Which of the following would you choose to do?
In my opinion, improvement in public transportation is the best choice for my city. I think this way because of two main reasons, which will explore in the following essay.
First, by improving transport of your city, you can earn more free time for your residents. High-speed subways, metros, domestic trains, and fast cars can develop your city’s circulation effectively. The use of a new generation of vehicles increases your crowd’s velocity and as a result, you will have less traffic and less heavy streets. How can it improve our lives? Speed gains time for us, the most valuable object in our century. You can use your saved time in many ways, like reading literature books, studying new topics in your life, playing gulf with your children, and even taking naps. As you can see, high-speed transportation can flourish all elements of a human’s life. Without a doubt, excellent transportation can easily push our life qualities up, by saving our time. The better transportation you have, the less time you waste.
Second, a robust transportation system increases your town’s efficiency. We can’t reach other towns’ industrial level unless we make asset transportation for our one. The transportation system should cover all of your urban territory and its major components like trucks, airplanes, ships, and trains should work synchronized and fast. With that type of transportation, you can develop your city’s industrial rank, and it lets you manage your city better to make formidable goals in the future. When I was a child, we were living in a small city in the middle of my country’s desserts. Our climate was dry and there were no exports, which could help my city’s economy. After a while, our society tried to develop the city’s transportation. We manufactured new trains with the newest technological parts, and we installed rails all around the city. Building new lines for the subway system was another effort. Engineers thrived our transportation, then it accelerated our industries. After a while, all famous companies tried to build factories in my city and as a result, wealth came to my territory.
In conclusion, the best way of developing a city is to upgrade its transportation. In my opinion, it has two main reasons. Good transportation earns time and boosts your capitalism.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, while, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 22.412803532 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 1373.03311258 144% => OK
No of words: 380.0 270.72406181 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21578947368 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14767095008 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 145.348785872 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 419.366225166 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 2.5761589404 388% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 13.0662251656 191% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4990929462 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.28 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 4.33554083885 369% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139149447536 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443474669677 0.0996497079465 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545544612861 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764691142577 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406079536455 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.