The increment in human population caused reduction in birds population
The article claims that the increment in human population and also agriculture lands has affected the wildlife and decreased the number of animals and especially birds, The passage has supported its idea by three reasons. However, the professor in the lecture believes that these reasons are unconvincing.
First, the passage declares that the increment of human population has decreased the birds natural habitats. As a result, birds population which highly depends on their habitats, has been decayed. However, the professors claims that this has not lead to a uniform decrease in the birds population. She believes that the cities provided better places for a lot of birds such as pigeons and their number in the cities even have been increased.
Second, the article states that the lands which are being used for agriculture lead to decrements of bird's habitats and their population. However, the lecturer claims that nowadays in the united states less and less lands are being used. She states that new crops are being planted in the farms that produces more and more foods and are more efficient than the traditional farming.
Third, the article claims that the use of pesticides for agriculture poisons the water and insects which are being used by birds as food and this kills these birds. Nevertheless, the professor claims that in the modern agriculture, they are using new less intoxicating pesticides that do not harm the birds. She also states that the scientists are developing pest resistant crops which do not harm the wildlife at all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
...the professors claims that this has not lead to a uniform decrease in the birds popu...
^^^^
Line 2, column 280, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...s not lead to a uniform decrease in the birds population. She believes that the citie...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun lands is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... nowadays in the united states less and less lands are being used. She states that n...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12992125984 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58595492504 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46062992126 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3351004046 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.583333333 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182371862166 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788922471162 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112525618917 0.0662205650399 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120172158049 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106841765562 0.0443174109184 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.