The reading passage mentions that discovered coins do not belong to eleventh century and provides three main points to support it. The professor's lecture deals with the same issue. However, she believes that the reasons in the reading are not convincing and provides three specific reasons to underscore his standpoint.
First, the passage states that long distance from Europeans' settlement to the place of discovery support the idea that coins do not belong to Norse. Nevertheless, the lecturer rebuts this point by providing some example of other sites. She says that there are other sites that have long distance from the place of discovery. Indeed, first European loved to travel and had strong passion finding new places.
Second, the reading mentions that lonely found coins also emphasizes that coins are new. Nonetheless, the professor rejects this point. She asserts that the time Norse wanted to come back to Europe were engaged in difficult situation. Actually, they packed up all of their coins to Europe and this is the main cause that the number of remaining coins are rare.
Third, the article states that European coin were useless. However, the professor casts doubt on this point by providing some of the first coins features. She expresses that first coins were attractive and beautiful. The coins had enough beauty to be considered in jewelries. Also, coins were good in commerce and people did trade with them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... casts doubt on this point by providing some of the first coins features. She expresses tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17094017094 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39221593006 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559829059829 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4003881345 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.625 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.625 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360698015041 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118700331558 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685949951572 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21674387193 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626921718721 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.