integrated writting
In this set of materials, both the reading and the lecture discuse if online or printed more in importance and which one is more valuabe. The reading states that online encyclopedia have huge problems and explains by giving supporative reasons. The lecture refutes this by mentioned thatcommand every reasons. unal encyclopedia is not perfect and the crisiszm mwentioned in reading is not accurate and it opposes each
First, the reading claims that online one lack academic knowledge and inter many inaccurate information while the wriiten one is done by experts. The lecture argues this popint by statings that although the online one have wrongs, the traditional ones is not accurate always too . Furthermore, the communal work is have no errors and if there are it can be corrected because the written wrong information stay for decay.
SDecond, the reading makes the argument that the online encyclopedia has many hackers and they can make changes on the original information so even if the entry is correct they could change it easily. The lecture counters this argumnets by mentioned that there is many ways to protect the formate form hackers or dispute so no one able to change it. Besides, the information is reliable because of many experts are reduce the changes that hackers made and keep melicuous the formate.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that the communal encyclopedia concentrate on subjects in repeated ways which give a false imperesssion about which is important. In contrast, the traditional provides information about subjects equally.The lecture refutes this claims by pointing out that although there is no enough space in online one it include a variety of subjects and has a diversity of uses which makes it one of the most important factors over the communal ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h the reading and the lecture discuse if online or printed more in importance ...
^^
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng and the lecture discuse if online or printed more in importance and which o...
^^
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e lecture discuse if online or printed more in importance and which one is mor...
^^
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... online or printed more in importance and which one is more valuabe. The readi...
^^
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Unal
...by mentioned thatcommand every reasons. unal encyclopedia is not perfect and the cri...
^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much inaccurate information', 'a good deal of inaccurate information'.
Suggestion: much inaccurate information; a good deal of inaccurate information
...e one lack academic knowledge and inter many inaccurate information while the wriiten one is done by expert...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ditional ones is not accurate always too . Furthermore, the communal work is have ...
^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...too . Furthermore, the communal work is have no errors and if there are it can be co...
^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are many ways'?
Suggestion: there are many ways
...unters this argumnets by mentioned that there is many ways to protect the formate form hackers or ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
...is reliable because of many experts are reduce the changes that hackers made and keep ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out which is important. In contrast, the traditional provides information about s...
^^
Line 6, column 239, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ides information about subjects equally.The lecture refutes this claims by pointing...
^^^
Line 6, column 343, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'includes'?
Suggestion: includes
...ere is no enough space in online one it include a variety of subjects and has a diversi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, if, lastly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16723549488 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7121025097 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498293515358 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.4494947546 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.636363636 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.8541721854 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.