"let is burn" policy and its effects
The article states the disadvantages of "let it burn" policy in which forest fire would not be controlled. The author of the article provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that "let it burn" policy could be beneficial and refutes the author's reason.
First, the reading claims that big forest fires like Yellowstone fires is responsible for huge damage to the park's trees and its ecosystem. The professor refutes this point by saying that the policy is good because it can make an opportunity for the environment to colonize with new plants. She states that fire causes new plants to grow better and also it is beneficial for some plant's seeds which need to high heat in order to starting growing.
Second, the author of the article posits that the wildlife of the park was damaged because most small animals was not able to escape from the fire. However, this argument is challenged by the professor. She explains that animals like rabbits can have new opportunity by accessing to new plants which would be fresher and stronger than before.
Third, the authors explains that the tourism can be affected by such huge fire which causes the park to lose its attraction for visitors. The professor, on the other hand, refutes this idea. She puts forth the reason that such a fire is rare and it has not happened since 1988 which caused the professor to conclude its effect would be superficial on tourism.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94285714286 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49736554237 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518367346939 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5439277541 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.916666667 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106365837887 0.272083759551 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413393248652 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052876545436 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659558049443 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549935730048 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.