The author contradicts those who believe that an advanced weapon has existed called a burning mirror approximately 2200 years ago, as several reasons he's holding the opinion is a follow.
First of all, the Greeks were not fully advanced enough to build such the developed device at the time. The device consists of a variety of complicated requirements to apply to the work causing Roman's ship to catch fire in some distances, he surmised that it is unreal to believe, in the ancient period, Greeks invented that breakthrough weapon further than the way they did at the time.
From his experiment, it proved that it possibly works in certain ways; Greeks' inventive mirror takes about 10 minutes to make them on fire in 10 meters, on the condition that the enemy's ship is completely static. However, in fact, Romans' ship was positively moving forward to attack the Greeks' territories. As its inefficiency, it is not realistic to believe the weapon existence.
Last reason for the authors' belief is concretely based on the usage of flaming arrows. If they used flaming arrows as the main weapon for the sort of occasion, in regarding the distance and time, the arrow was effectively casing the Romans' ship on fire for sure, rather than by the burning mirror.
In the nutshell, from the above reasons, the author insists that there is no use having the burning mirror, that is to say, the ancient Greeks has not had such the weapon.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he's
...ately 2200years ago, as several reasons hes holding the opinion is a follow. Fir...
^^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...eral reasons hes holding the opinion is a follow. First of all, the Greeks were not f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...eapon existence. Last reason for the authors belief is concretely based on the usage...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ving the burning mirror, that is to say, the ancient Greeks has not had such the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, so, in fact, sort of, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84897959184 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56087890993 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579591836735 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.1715338297 49.2860985944 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187887547332 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747980204647 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432584095517 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104225375487 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291198465086 0.0443174109184 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.