living on Mars
The reading and the lecture are both about the possibility of living or constant presence of human on Mars. Actually, the author provides three challenges that humans will encounter in the case of living on Mars. On the other hand, the professor is not convinced of this and casts doubt on each of the reasons presented in the passage. Personally, he is on the opinion that although human permanent residence on Mars is challenging, however, it can be possible by putting a station floating in the atmosphere, at 50 Km higher than the Mars surface.
To begin with, the author argues that the pressure on Mars' surface is as high as force of 100 Kg on each square, which is enough high to crush almost anything. The professor, in contrast, opposes this notion by asserting that pressure is much lower in this higher levels of atmosphere. Hence, no peril threaten human beings at the station floating 50 Km higher than the surface of Mars.
Secondly, the writer disputes that there is not any resource of water or oxygen on Mars' surface. Moreover, it continues that exporting water and O2 from Earth to Mars constantly is not plausible. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. Therefore, he averts that CO2 and SO2, which are abundant on Mars, can be converted to water and oxygen in the station by utilizing chemical material.
Finally, the author asserts that merely little sunlight can enter the Mars' surface owing to the high rate of sunlight reflection by thick clouds in the atmosphere. Additionally, it states that even more lights will be blocked by dense layer of CO2, which all prevent us from using solar energy as electricity. The lecture's stance is that clouds at 50 Km higher than Mars' surface is less thicker which allows more sunlight penetrating. Also, the professor mentions that some special machines in the station are capable of utilizing reflected energy by clouds in order to yield electricity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 315, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lectures'' or 'lecture's'?
Suggestion: lectures'; lecture's
... using solar energy as electricity. The lectures stance is that clouds at 50 Km higher t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 383, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less thick'?
Suggestion: less thick
...ds at 50 Km higher than Mars surface is less thicker which allows more sunlight penetrating....
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, as for, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 328.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89024390244 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63340521417 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5564403811 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.933333333 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216398488915 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660389082354 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644120706919 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126349482343 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734705822945 0.0443174109184 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.