The reading claims that living on the Moon and Mars is feasible while, it is not possible on the Venus because it's conditions are absolutely tough and inhospitable. The lecturer, however, finds the idea dubious and casts a shadow of doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
The author argues that the atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface is at least 90 times greater than the pressure at Earth surface. Hence, if anything go there, it would be crushed. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that this problem has a solution. The way of dealing with this obstacle is flowting like a balloon in the atmosphere at the distance of 50 kilometer from the surface of the Venus.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that on Venus' surface there are no reservoirs of water. in addition, the planet's atmosphere rarely has oxygen, conversely it mostly is made up of carbon dioxide, nitrogen and sulfuric acid. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that by conducting some actions we can produce water from other chemical materials.
Finally, the reading asserts that most of the sunlight cannot reach the surface of Venus. The rationale of this phenomenon is the high reflection of lights from the thick clouds of atmosphere as well as the block of sunlights passed the higher cloads by lower cloads. therefore, we cannot use solar energy for our power stations. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that in the hight of 50 kilometer obove of surface of Venus, there are not very thick cloads. Thus, in this height we can utilize the reflected and also the passed light and eventually use them, as the source of energy, for the power stations.
The reading claims that living on the Moon and Mars is feasible while it is not possible on Venus because its conditions are absolutely tough and inhospitable. The lecturer, however, finds the idea dubious and casts a shadow of doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
The author argues that the atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface is at least 90 times greater than the pressure at the Earth surface. Hence, if anything goes there, it would be crushed. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that this problem has a solution. The way of dealing with this obstacle is floating like a balloon in the atmosphere at a distance of 50 kilometers from the surface of the Venus.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that on Venus' surface there are no reservoirs of water. In addition, the planet's atmosphere rarely has oxygen, conversely, it mostly is made up of carbon dioxide, nitrogen and sulfuric acid. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that by conducting some actions we can produce water from other chemical materials.
Finally, the reading asserts that most of the sunlight cannot reach the surface of Venus. The rationale of this phenomenon is the high reflection of lights from the thick clouds of the atmosphere as well as the block of sunlights passed the higher clouds by lower clouds. Therefore, we cannot use solar energy for our power stations. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that in the height of 50 kilometers above of surface of Venus, there are not very thick clouds. Thus, in this height, we can utilize the reflected and also the passing light and eventually use them, as the source of energy, for the power stations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ons proposed by the reading passage. The author argues that the atmospheric pres...
^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
...o reservoirs of water. In addition, the planets atmosphere rarely has oxygen, conversel...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, at least, in addition, in contrast, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89383561644 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5886129783 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558219178082 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8294373013 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.071428571 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245138855266 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882008742688 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170893256452 0.0662205650399 258% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222423983937 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.326045809365 0.0443174109184 736% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.