Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, there have been manifold leaders who have led their country or group toward the success and prosperity. But which features do leaders have to have? A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is whether the leadership is an innate ability or we can learn to be a leader. Some people possess the conviction that leadership is an intrinsic feature which few people have it whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that by some education all persons can be a leader. I personally contend that although there are some inherent features which can contribute to being a good leader, everybody can be a leader if he learns some skills. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that from the psychological point of view, one of the most important features which a leader should learn is that he has to know how he can manage his group. In other words, he should manipulate the group's members and utilize their abilities and expertise. The ability to maximize the efficiency of workers plays a key role in prosperity of companies. The noteworthy statistics, revealed in a social research conducted in my country, shows that from the view of about 1000 managers and leaders, the ability of managing the group is of paramount importance and can pinpoint the fate of the group. Had the leader not had this feature, his group would not have been successful.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that another feature which can be learned by all people and considerably is decisive for a leader, is that he would be resourceful. In fact, he must be knowledgeable. He should solve the problems which others cannot figure out. leaders can acquire this property only through studying different and various books, attending in some classes and experiencing tough situations. To shed light on this issue, take my personal experience as a real example. Three years ago, I worked in a project of building a 58 story tower. This project in many aspects was an unprecedented project. At first, a fairly young man was a manager of this project. He dealt with different problems. For instance, the engineers and labors were discontent with his approaches. Finally, the principal of the company decided to replace him with a more experienced and skilled manager. Thus, most of the problems were solved.
In conclusion, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that not only all people can be a leader, but also they can be a successful leader in overwhelming projects. However, we have to keep in our mind that the innate talent is not a disputable feature. If we have less inherent abilities, we should strive to learn knowledge and experience different circumstances to overcome our drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
...g reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Leaders
...roblems which others cannot figure out. leaders can acquire this property only through ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, thus, whereas, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2456.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 490.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01224489796 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86070914454 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524489795918 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7158501023 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4615384615 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26923076923 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152529168635 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408166784948 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041341153898 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945620398839 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261464263487 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.