Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
•Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's world, the high speed of science improvement leads to some contention among experts, scientists, and also students in the conferences, lectures and so on. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is what the best reaction in such a condition is and how we can manipulate it. Some people possess the conviction that the best approach is to interrupt and correct the mistake, whereas others allege that it should be better to wait until the class and then talk to the lecturer. In addition, some people hold the opinion that it is better to say nothing. I personally contend that the best response is to wait until the class or meeting is finished and after the culmination it talk to the teacher or meeting lead. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that interrupting a speech in order to enhance mistakes does not seem polite. If I were a lecturer, would never withstand such a behavior from my audiences. Hence, not only this reaction could not be considered as an appropriate conduct, but also it might be improper. In addition, in my point of view, staying silent is also inappropriate due to the fact that this apathy may leads to the circulation of wrong information. Thus, this behavior, similar to the former one, does not seem logical.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that maybe our thought is wrong. In the other words, it is possible that the audience misunderstands the subject and therefore, based on the erroneous information, concludes incorrectly. By taking into account this possibility, in my opinion waiting until the end of speech would be rational. It is obvious that the persuasion of lecturer after the class could be more efficient than during it. Furthermore, if we are in a wrong position, this behavior would be more fruitful.
I brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that criticizing to the teacher after the class is a polite and also logical response. Consequently, it is highly recommended that it is crucial to avoid making decision hastily and without thinking sufficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 713, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'talks'?
Suggestion: talks
...s finished and after the culmination it talk to the teacher or meeting lead. To subs...
^^^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
... reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this behavior would be more fruitful. I brief, contemplating all the aforement...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02894736842 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94644134856 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2010304517 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.166666667 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152691412241 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440952543989 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655242609173 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829877877541 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787395640993 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.