Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history teachers always are respected by the society for their pivotal role in the prosperity of nations. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is whether these days they are appreciated and valued like former teachers. Some people possess the conviction that in the modern era teachers do not receive admiration and respect from the society, whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that still people appreciate teachers and praise them. I personally contend that nowadays we pay less attention to teachers and do not value them like past times. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that in recent years the sense of appreciation to other people in almost all of men and women become less. Maybe, this unpleasant demeanor is a consequence of bad breeding of children. Also, this could be a result of not spending enough time and paying attention to the children. Thus, society encounters some people who have not learned how they should behave with others, especially with older persons such as their teacher, grandfather, grandmother, and so on. Hence, we can anticipate this bad conduct would continue and convey to the next generations which can be a terrible phenomenon.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that in the 21st century values are changing. In order to shed light on this issue we can draw a comparison between the current behaviour of children with their parents and this in the past. I think this conspicuous difference is one of the results of globalization. Although globalization has manifold advantages for example in economic context and assists in thriving of poor countries and escalating of their GDP, it has some undesirable effects on the culture of nation. The last research which has been conducted by Planning and Management Organization of my country vividly demonstrates this claim. Results of this study reveals that, not only the globalization cannot affect the cultural matters in the right order, but also this engenders some bad habits. The less appreciation and value to the teachers could be one of these unpleasant habits.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that the sense of respect and value nowadays is less than past and this can be a bad news for our generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are always
Throughout history teachers always are respected by the society for their pivo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
... reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'bad news'.
Suggestion: bad news
...adays is less than past and this can be a bad news for our generation.
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s can be a bad news for our generation.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, regarding, second, so, still, thus, whereas, for example, i think, in brief, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2104.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1568627451 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84306541491 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571078431373 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.572731519 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.888888889 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138545534438 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441261124775 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396513641927 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894346186378 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385086018455 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.