Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's world, education and the ways to escalate the level of that is a matter of dispute. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is whether to improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professor or there are other approaches for achieving this goal. Some people possess the conviction that increasing the salary of professors can play a key role in their quality of teaching and as a result, on the education of students whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that there are other ways which can be more influential. I personally contend that although spending more money can have some positive effect on the trend of teaching, there are other works that would more fruitful. The following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that from the psychological point of view, respecting to professors and admiring and also appreciating them can have a significant effect on the quality of professors, functions. The noteworthy statistics, revealed by a recent social a psychological research conducted in our country, show that if professors have a sense that other people respect them and know their impression on the economic, cultural etc. future of country, they would be encouraged and stimulated to work harder than the past. Therefore, implementing some works such as appreciating, providing some amenities for them, and behaving in a respectful manner can contribute to the improvement of their functionality.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that universities can spend more money on some other fields. For example, they can spend money on laboratory equipment or rising the features of campus computers. Besides, they can establish some places where students can discuss their lessons and learn teamwork. In addition to the mentioned advice, they can conduct some science trips for students and professors. According to the latest researches, these measures can have a sensational influence on the quality of students' education. Had they thought in laboratories and field, they would learn their lessons better.
In conclusion, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that there are some other works that universities can do to improve the quality of education. However, they should pay enough attention to the salary of their professors and try to strike a right balance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
...ng reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 267, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n the quality of professors, functions. The noteworthy statistics, revealed by a re...
^^^
Line 2, column 692, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a respectful manner" with adverb for "respectful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...g some amenities for them, and behaving in a respectful manner can contribute to the improvement of th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2158.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34158415842 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97021864583 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522277227723 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8166163641 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.941176471 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7647058824 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47058823529 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20515974269 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690914010937 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755914402838 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136657866155 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596954126396 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.