Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more
effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
In today's world, the methods of teaching and giving assignments and projects to the students are matters of dispute. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is whether it is true that when teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Some people possess the conviction that it can be a true statement Whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that they are skeptical to this fact and think working on projects individually would be more fruitful. I personally contend that working together has a host of advantages which one of them is learning much more effectively than work alone. The following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that from the psychological point of view, working together always are advised. They believe that if students work together, they would consult with each other and therefore, they can learn from their friends. To shed light on this issue, take my personal experience as a real example. When I was studying in high school, the teacher of mathematics asked us we establish groups of four members and in each group work on one subjects of mathematics. It was a fantastic and unbelievable experience for me. In my group, all of us have some troubles in some realms. On the other hand, we were supplementary of each other. In other words, we could solve some problems of our teammate and on the other case, others solve our obstacles.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that working together leads to more creativity. Teamwork contribute to brain storming. Thus, it can help us to broaden our minds and ponder more widely and profoundly than working individually. As a result, that students who work in groups, know more aspects of that project and they have a precise and exhaustive analyses of that project. The noteworthy statistics, revealed by a recent research in my country, shows that, in average, students who are working together are more prosperous than those who work individually. Furthermore, they can have better choices and decisions in dilemmas of their lives.
In conclusion, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that not only working together contribute to learning more things, but also it can foster other abilities. Therefore, it is recommended that teachers and parents pay careful attention to this subject and help their youths to be more potent and prosperous persons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
...ng reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 818, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other case, others solve our obstacles. The second rationale behind this opinion...
^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: recent research
... The noteworthy statistics, revealed by a recent research in my country, shows that, in average, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 672, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d decisions in dilemmas of their lives. In conclusion, contemplating all the afo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, whereas, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2223.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11034482759 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81470761189 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512643678161 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4190267194 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.857142857 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47619047619 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347604475194 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927055460597 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115249625969 0.0737576698707 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203234746582 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133112314251 0.0645574589148 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.