Lunar theory

Essay topics:

Lunar theory

different theories were suggested for how moon formed in the passage while in lecture it is explained that why these theories are not adequate. The speaker contradicts the author with regards to lunar formation theories by giving specific reasons and examples.

Firstly, the speaker points out that as per author, moon was formed by fission. In early age of earth moon might be rapidly spinning. A piece of earth form pacific ocean would have sperated forming moon. The speaker states that this is misconception. In reality, it was not possible. Such fisson could shatter earth. Furthermore, he gave evidence of Apollo mission. composition of rocks collected by them were completely different that earth rock.

Secondly, he opposes the co-acceration theory. Earth and moon are sisters formed during Nebula interstellar event. He clarifies in practice if these two have formed during this event, it would have same core composition. earth have 50%n iron whereas moon have 25% iron as their core material. Additionally he said that gravitational force will have fused them together by using dust and gas.

Thirdly, the speaker denies the validity of the point that averred in the passage. Giant impact theory suggest that some mars sized planed striked earth 4.5 billion years ago. It created many pieces, later they fused to form moon. It is quiet contrary. speaker contradicts this theory by saying that. If this had happened in past moon will not be same as today. It must be like different pieces. Moon has its own biochemical process. It is harder than earth.

Speaker suggests that much research needed because none of these theory is convincing. Hence after this holistic analysis speaker lucidly substantiates his points of view with cogency.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Different
different theories were suggested for how moon fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Composition
...re, he gave evidence of Apollo mission. composition of rocks collected by them were complet...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Earth and moon are sisters formed during Nebula interstellar event. He clarifies ...
^^
Line 9, column 205, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'cored'.
Suggestion: cored
...d during this event, it would have same core composition. earth have 50%n iron where...
^^^^
Line 9, column 223, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Earth
...t, it would have same core composition. earth have 50%n iron whereas moon have 25% ir...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 295, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...n have 25% iron as their core material. Additionally he said that gravitational force will h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 254, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Speaker
...sed to form moon. It is quiet contrary. speaker contradicts this theory by saying that....
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 302, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...contradicts this theory by saying that. If this had happened in past moon will not...
^^
Line 17, column 60, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this theory' or 'these theories'?
Suggestion: this theory; these theories
...at much research needed because none of these theory is convincing. Hence after this holisti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 88, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...use none of these theory is convincing. Hence after this holistic analysis speaker lu...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, whereas, while, as for, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22887323944 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56402590152 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616197183099 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 13.0662251656 199% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 21.2450331126 47% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1045515441 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 57.1153846154 110.228320801 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.9230769231 21.698381199 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.11538461538 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 19.0 4.27373068433 445% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148066896953 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359812001826 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079215818735 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110502202892 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13743131078 0.0443174109184 310% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.3589403974 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 53.8541721854 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.87 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.498013245 57% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.