a mandatory policy, requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working four-day workweek for 80% of the regular pay would benefit the economy as well as individual companies. Also, the employees who decided to take this option will benefits. The professor disputes these benefits, claiming that, this may cause many problems to both company and employee.
Although a mandatory policy, requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working four-day workweek for 80% of the regular pay would benefit the economy as well as individual companies. Also, the employees who decided to take this option will benefits. The professor disputes these benefits, claiming that, this may cause many problems to both company and employee.
First, he examines the point of increasing company profits due to the option of working four-day workweek. The professor asserts that this option will force the companies to spend more expenses to cover many necessaries like, provide training to these employees, medical benefits will not defer for both types of employees who work for four days or five days in the week. Furthermore, the company will need office space and more computers to these employees.
Second, he counters the point of lessening unemployment rates. The professor declared that the company would prefer to make their employees working overtime because the cost of hiring new employees will be higher than overtime cost to the existed employees. Moreover, he points to that the company will consider that the target tasks or the amount of work in the workday will be the same for the employee, who works for four days or five days.
Lastly, he refutes that the option of a four-day workweek would improve the quality of life to the employee. He says that the quality of life for this employee will decrease. Also, the job ability may reduce, and this may cause an adverse effect on advance his career.
Besides, the company will prefer the employee who works five days in the week for the management position for many reasons like coverage and consistency supervision in the entire week.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...es who decided to take this option will benefits. The professor disputes these benefits,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s or five days in the week. Furthermore, the company will need office space and m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09375 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48098235332 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493055555556 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1454678283 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.846153846 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.562893563682 0.272083759551 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207466567463 0.0996497079465 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.196736197696 0.0662205650399 297% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324820996279 0.162205337803 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.202780511367 0.0443174109184 458% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.