In the reading passage, the author claims that increasing taxes on sigarettes and other unhealthy products are beneficial to society. The lecturer, however, contradicts this view for the following three reasons.
First of all, in the reading article, it is said that higher taxes helps people to quite smoke and other unhealthy behaviours. Furthermore, it is stated that smoking has decreased after increasing taxes, and reducing obesity rates can be looked forward to.In contrast, the lecturer holds that this solution is not going to make people stay away from unhealthy behaviors, because people will buy cheaper cigarettes instead of good quality cigarettes. Additionally, she argues that the cheaper one is more toxic and people will continue to buy unhealthy food even is getting more expensive. They will have less money to buy healthy products.
Second, the author mentions that taxes of unhealthy products are fair economiclly. However, the lecturer maintains an oppesite opinion that it is actrually financially unfair. Futher, He remarks that people with lower income is more influenced than people with better salary.
Third, the author in the passage believed that the taxes can create more revenue for the government. But the lecturer refutes such idea by pointing out that the government will depends on the taxes, in the future people might not allowed to smoke outside by law or policies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... obesity rates can be looked forward to.In contrast, the lecturer holds that this ...
^^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'depend'
Suggestion: depend
...y pointing out that the government will depends on the taxes, in the future people migh...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'smoking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: smoking
... in the future people might not allowed to smoke outside by law or policies.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, look, second, so, third, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31838565022 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59876981216 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609865470852 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.7324283978 49.2860985944 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.818181818 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178902819311 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704274872858 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709101772614 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107081750535 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366106136856 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.