In the reading passage, the writer claims that there are three ways to save lake's water being too salty. The speaker, however, contradics this view for the following three reasons.
First, in the reading passage, it is said that the people can remove salt from lake by using special facilities. Furthermore, it is started in the article that people could pumped and heated the water, dissolve the salt and release the steam. In contrast, the listening holds a view that this solution put people's health in danger. The steam might includes tocxic chemical materials. If people breath it in the air, people would be in danger.
Second, the auther asserts that dilute the salt level with ocean water though pipelines or canals. Also, he marks that Pacific Ocean is 20 percent fresher than lake' water. However, the professor maintains an opposite opionion that the government might don not have much resources for those pipes. Pacific Ocean is 100 kilometers away and the transport fee is very expensive.
Third, the author of the reading passage believes that constructing walls to seperate the lake into different sections would help to control the lake's salinity. But the professor refutes such idea by pointing out that this solution is not stable. Walls would be destroied easily by earthquakes. Then, all sections' water will join together quickly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'pump'
Suggestion: pump
...tarted in the article that people could pumped and heated the water, dissolve the salt...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... that the government might don not have much resources for those pipes. Pacific Ocea...
^^^^
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lakes'' or 'lake's'?
Suggestion: lakes'; lake's
...rent sections would help to control the lakes salinity. But the professor refutes suc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, then, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09459459459 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39179009301 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635135135135 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5006878232 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.4 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215057487021 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629954594432 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599780360434 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124523834054 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221398124188 0.0443174109184 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.