nbjdhfgoidsjkopq[;w
The lecturer and the article are both discussing a phenomenon of communication through internet. The article states that this is a breakthrough in a way of participating in different activities, when the lecturer is confident that there are too many risks and disadvantages.
First and foremost, the lecturer provide listener with a few examples of dangerous schemes hiding withing the internet. He states that there are a lot of frauds who use personal information of users to steal money. Moreover, he claims that users, especially young ones, can be easily manipulated. The article convey the contemporary way of communication as an efficient way to be engaged in communication in more convenient way, than in the past. However, the lecturer says that we rely to much on the communication through internet resourses.
Secondly, when in the article it is stated, that you can find people who share your unique hobbies and interests, the lecturer argues that we are lacking social skills nowadays. In America, with every further year, the amount of friends for person has increased drastically. He states that we tend to have a lot of acquaintances, who we are not familiar very well with. Moreover, only a few people tend to communicate with their neighbours, and a vast amount of people share their problems with family members or leave them uncovered to others.
Last but not least, the article points out the ability to speak up freely, when the lecturer cast doubt on this point by stating that we should use real communication abilities and create strong relationships with people in real life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'conveys'.
Suggestion: conveys
... can be easily manipulated. The article convey the contemporary way of communication a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...However, the lecturer says that we rely to much on the communication through inter...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10227272727 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97346072177 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5942145908 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.