The newspaper committee wants to decide wich student worth the schoolarship that they provide. According to different criteria, there were 2 final students to choose between them. what conclusion should be drwan from the infromation in the reading and listening?
The article states that the newspaper community in college was interested in providing a scholarship to one deserving student. The committee that was responsible for choosing the worthy recipient of the award decided that the student should possess three main charactersicts, they also, reached to two finalists according to the listening, the two final students were Baki and Raulf.
The passage states that the first characteristic that the student should have, is that he/she should be majoring in journalism with high grades ad indication commitment to high education. The conversation about the finalists, Baki and Raulf, states that Baki is majoring in journalism with grades varies between A and B, but she always gets A in journalism. On the other hand, Raulf is majoring in biology, but he also takes a class in journalism, all his grades are A.
The second characteristic as the passage states was being actively involved in wide variety of activities. According to the committee in the listening, Beki is a soccer player and she plays music, in addition, she is a part of the photography club and a member of student console. The other candidate, Raulf, spends most of his time in the lab, devoting his time to biology and research, but he also won many awards in this field.
The last characteristic the worthy student should have is taking steps to improve the lives of people living in his community, not only his or her life. The committee's member states that Beki volunteers to help the elderly and spend some of her off-campus time in a local hospital, Raulf on the other hand spends his off campus time to attend sporting events.
From all this drawn information, I find Baki is a lot worthy to win this award as she meet all the criteria perfectly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...o final students were Baki and Raulf. The passage states that the first character...
^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'grades'' or 'grade's'?
Suggestion: grades'; grade's
...uld be majoring in journalism with high grades ad indication commitment to high educat...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ndication commitment to high education. The conversation about the finalists, Baki ...
^^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...is community, not only his or her life. The committees member states that Beki volu...
^^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'committees'' or 'committee's'?
Suggestion: committees'; committee's
...ommunity, not only his or her life. The committees member states that Beki volunteers to h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91029900332 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80373477478 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524916943522 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.4098286468 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.363636364 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167778883753 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634642223891 0.0996497079465 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066612696305 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940363089351 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755591718678 0.0443174109184 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.