Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The lecture states that people and different kind of mammals as cats may not commit altruistic acts, but they also get non material appericiation as a reward for that, which contradicts with the meaning of altruism which supported by the passage as a complete selfless performing.
For example, the lecture mentioned that people who show such a selfless behavior like donating organs for family members of strangers, they don't benfit directly from it, but on the other hand, they recieve approval from the others, and they feel selfworthy. This opinion oppose the part of the passage that indicates donating organs as example of selfishness and altruism.
Another example provided in the lectures, was a specy of cats, that guard their groups while they eat, which seems to be an altrustic act, but actually, they eat first before standing to guard, also when they do their job and cry out loud when there are predators comming, they may make the predators pay attention more to the group and put them in danger. This is another example that conflicts with what is stated in the passage, which was the example of the meerkat, the mammal who devotes himself to gurad the rest of the group, even if they won't eat, or even more, they won't survive the attack of the predators.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s for family members of strangers, they dont benfit directly from it, but on the oth...
^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'opposes'.
Suggestion: opposes
... and they feel selfworthy. This opinion oppose the part of the passage that indicates ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, so, while, for example, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 219.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84474885845 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40486291735 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611872146119 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0662251656 38% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 21.2450331126 202% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.3719337518 49.2860985944 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 212.2 110.228320801 193% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.8 21.698381199 202% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 17.4 7.06452816374 246% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0838212500953 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412278083661 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268435808494 0.0662205650399 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.050066500488 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258126275473 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.3 13.3589403974 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.0289183223 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.68 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.498013245 183% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.