notefull-step1
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the value of the zoo. While the reading passage lists three evidence to support its importance in the modern society, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the passage.
First of all, the article avers that the animals are treated as well as in their wildlife by the passionate animals lovers. On the contrary, the professor challenges the validity of this claim for the sake of one of many severe living condition examples in the zoos. As he states, two red pandas died because of the rat poison in one of the zoos. It is sole one of the many examples in this field. As a result, it illustrates the animals have not treated as pretty as the author assumed.
Next, the passage posits that the zoos have the educational purpose rather than the entertainment function. Meanwhile, the professor dismisses this assertion for the sake of the fact that the majority of the zoos keep a distinctive animal to attract the people's attention for their own benefits. In this situation, the zoo does not have the educational utility. Moreover, as the animals are shown based on the zookeepers’ ideas, zoos do not convey the accurate data about their living habit. Therefore, this understanding from the zoos is misleading.
Finally, the text mentions that the zoos have the vital role in the protection of the endangered species. In the contrast, the lecturer opposes this surmise. Based on his declaration, although this example demonstrates the success of the zoo in this field; all in all, they have a poor success in this supporting. As they cover a small amount of the species, the animals interbreed by their own family members and the birth defeat is continued among the generations. Thereby, the zoo is not as efficient as passage asserted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...eep a distinctive animal to attract the peoples attention for their own benefits. In th...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'as a result', 'as well as', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.27808988764 0.261695866417 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.115168539326 0.158904122519 72% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0477528089888 0.0723426182421 66% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0449438202247 0.0435111971325 103% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0308988764045 0.0277247811725 111% => OK
Prepositions: 0.151685393258 0.128828473217 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0337078651685 0.0370669169778 91% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71884581075 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00842696629213 0.0208969081088 40% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.193820224719 0.128158765124 151% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.0114777025283 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1881.0 1645.83664459 114% => OK
No of words: 318.0 271.125827815 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91509433962 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339622641509 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.27358490566 0.287516216867 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.194968553459 0.187439937562 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.116352201258 0.113142543107 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71884581075 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518867924528 0.539623497131 96% => OK
Word variations: 53.4327259943 53.8517498576 99% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.7058823529 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7490588668 49.3711431718 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.647058824 132.220823453 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.705882352941 0.878197800319 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 46.064372919 50.5018328374 91% => OK
Elegance: 2.42647058824 1.90840788429 127% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.137662121394 0.142949733639 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0495505127722 0.0787303798458 63% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.655747310482 0.631733273073 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.118230731266 0.139662658121 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.603827959367 0.414875509568 146% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.100301449468 0.0530846634433 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.