31. As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author adduces that getting more information over the topic presents a complicated illustration instead of the lucid one from the topic. This is the claim with which I completely do not concur. Among the countless rearing reasons which give adherence to my viewpoint, I will list the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs to support my standpoint.
The first striking fact which should be considered is the complexity of over surrounding which the knowledge over it informs us about its complication; however, at the posited statement, the author considers this complexity as the failure of the knowledge. Indeed, the universe possesses various realm with various features and these features and differences are duplicated and repeated in semi-realms of each main realm. This fractal pattern with its endless repetition gives the intricate and mysterious appearance to the world; therefore, any achievement in any field obliges for further exploration which has no finish point. Thus, it would be an accurate explanation over the issue that the scientific understanding from the surrounded environment lucidly depicts the dominate intricated role and pattern on it. In addition, this knowledge shed the spotlights over this issue and paves the path for further understanding.
Another equal crux point which should be bolded is easiness providing to the knowledge over the world. In fact, in the past based on the ignorance and folly of human beings the existed issues gain a simple definition or even they totally were overlooked as there was no specified definition for them. On the other hand, the advancement of the understanding over the topics leads to the well-defined explanation over the topics; consequently, there is easiness of dealing with them. A lucid example which gives a clear view on the issue is the advancement of the field of medicine, while in the past all the diseases according to the shallow knowledge of human were categorized in some simple groups, in modern science various virus and microbes with their leaded illness are clarified by the doctors and scientists. This instance shows that the existence of problems in the past was underestimated by the people; however, it should be considered as their absences.
Finally, there are some groups who believe that the refreshing of the scientific finding illustrates their weakness in the presentation of the real picture from the world; therefore, all scientific finding are mistake and error. However, this group underestimates a crux fact about the instability of events. Indeed, the world owns a progressive feature, none of the items in the world has fixed and rigid positions; so, everything faces the alteration by the passage of times. In this case, the understanding of this progressive world should also represent the alteration too. For instance, while in the past the classical physics titled as the comprehensive indicator of the world, the definition of the relativity theory by Einstein causes the previous belief to get pale. Actually, this event fits with the changeable feature of the world and it is independent of the science shortage.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned facts comprehensively shows the effectiveness of the knowledge at the exploration of the complexity of the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 769, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... surrounded environment lucidly depicts the dominate intricated role and pattern on it. In a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oration of the complexity of the world.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, finally, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2782.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 526.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28897338403 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02513720873 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501901140684 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 863.1 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0435563718 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.1 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101176841582 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320038432975 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377562240605 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0587098655874 0.150359130593 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422724472486 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 153.0 100.480337079 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.