The article state that, Nuclear energy must be seen as the solution for the next step in the evolution of the energy production as compare to predominant sources like oil, gas and coal. The article also provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that nuclear energy has more disadvantages than benefits and refutes the each of the article points by explaining his own reasons.
First, the reading passage states that, fuel that powers the nuclear plants are cheaper than the fossil fuels. The professor discard this point by saying nuclear plans are not cheap compare to other energy sources. He explains that building the nuclear plan take much time and more time means more money. So the building the nuclear plant are not cheap option.
Second, the article posits that the process of creating nuclear energy is relatively safe. However, the professor denies, he state that no matter how we careful, so many times accidents are happens. According to the professor, the incident at the PWR plan in Pennsylvania was the one of the example for the risk that associated with nuclear energy and its rebuild cost was 1 billion.
Third, the reading state that the waste generated by the nuclear energy is effectively managed and reprocessing reduces the high-level waste. On the other side professor completely disagrees with the passage and opposes this point by explaining that the byproduct from the nuclear energy is not easy to manage. Professor also explains his point by saying that plutonium 239 is dangerous and dumping the waste of nuclear into the ground is not a permanent solution for disposing.
Sentence: The article state that, Nuclear energy must be seen as the solution for the next step in the evolution of the energy production as compare to predominant sources like oil, gas and coal.
Description: A conjunction, subordinating is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to as and compare
Sentence: First, the reading passage states that, fuel that powers the nuclear plants are cheaper than the fossil fuels.
Description: The fragment cheaper than the is not usually preceded by are
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace are with is
Sentence: The professor discard this point by saying nuclear plans are not cheap compare to other energy sources.
Sentence: The professor discarded this point by saying nuclear plans are not cheap compared to other energy sources.
Sentence: He explains that building the nuclear plan take much time and more time means more money.
Description: The fragment plan take much is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace take with verb, present tense, 3rd person singular
Sentence: So the building the nuclear plant are not cheap option.
Description: The fragment the nuclear plant is not usually followed by are
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace are with is
in Pennsylvania was the one of the example
in Pennsylvania was one of the examples
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
Double check grammar issues.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 269 250
No. of Characters: 1332 1200
No. of Different Words: 141 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.05 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.952 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.428 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 80 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.692 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.839 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.394 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.613 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.129 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4