nutria
Both the reaading and lecture discuss about Nutria. The reading passage provide three methods how to get rid of them by creating metal walls fence, drying up drainage, and cooking them for food. However, the lecturer refutes the belief that none of the method is successful to get rid of nutria.
First of all. the passage claims that creating metal fence and walls would be effective to catch nutria. This is because they cannot eat hard metal and it will save our gardens, farms and lawns. Nevertheless, the lecturer contrasts this idea by pointing out that nutrias have great digging abilities and they can able to dig underground and manage to get out of metal fence and walls. Furthermore, he says that no guarantee of security that metal fence will be beneficial.
Second, the reading mentions that drying up the drainage will be the best method to stop nutria. As this method will be effective only in highlands where water is using for cultivating sugarcane and rice crops. Yet the lecturer challenges this argument by revealing that stopping drainage water not only harm mankind but also it will stop growing crops. She states that it will have a negative impact on it.
Finally, the reading argues that eat nutria could be the most effective way to get rid of them. Since they are nutritious and have lots of proteins and carbohydrates as well as it's low in fat. On the other hand, the lecture rebuts this theory by explaining that nutrias contain diseases like bacteria and pluralism. She asserts that eating nutrias can be dangerous and not healthy like weight loss, rash, and fiver.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... to get rid of nutria. First of all. the passage claims that creating metal fenc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, nevertheless, second, so, well, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85766423358 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39029920498 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554744525547 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2873528473 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1875 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26791024833 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106564604102 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110740943099 0.0662205650399 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179855134519 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748264425427 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.