Offering employees options
The speaker believes that offering employees to be able to have four day workweeks will not affect the items mentioned in the reading the way they were explained in the reading.
He expresses that offering the option to work for four days would not help companies save money since it would force them to spend more on training new employees and medical insurance. He denotes that the training and medical costs are the same regardless of how many days per week the employee will be working. He also states that hiring more employees will result in the need for more office space and computers.
Another point he makes is that this might not result in more jobs. The companies might ask their current employees to work overtime to cover the extra workload. He believes it is possible that the companies might even go further and raise expectations, making it seem so that four day employees need to do the same amount of work as full time employees. This way, no jobs will be added while making work harder for four day employees.
Another issue the speaker is concerned with is the fact that employees who choose to work four days a week might have a less stable job. He believes that this would hurt their career and make them prone to being the first people to lose their jobs at the time of crisis. He also states that these employees would probably be passed over for promotion since the companies would want full time employees as managers so that they can supervise other employees during the course of the week.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... per week the employee will be working. He also states that hiring more employees ...
^^
Line 9, column 334, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...s need to do the same amount of work as full time employees. This way, no jobs will be ad...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 383, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...romotion since the companies would want full time employees as managers so that they can ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 458, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'during'.
Suggestion: during
...that they can supervise other employees during the course of the week.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68148148148 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24428553404 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503703703704 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3513332477 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.909090909 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 7.06452816374 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23127871311 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894683428759 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751155608661 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149865798149 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587650839105 0.0443174109184 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.42419426049 84% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.